Framing.
Dictionary.com defines framing as the act, process, or manner of constructing anything. Hmm… that sounds familiar. The media has been known to do a lot of framing, have we not? Whether it is social or political issues, framing is just something we learn how to do along the way. But why must we have to frame a topic just to get the public to see our view? Can we not simply present the facts openly and hope that the public truly understands without having to slightly manipulate how they view them? Of course we can’t!
This probably explains the mistrust the public has for the media does it not? Why should they [the public] trust us [the public relations professionals] if all we seem to do is manipulate the frame so they see things our way? They shouldn’t; thus it presents the need for a change.
As future public relations practitioners, I think we should come up with one set frame. A set frame that is clear and concise. Granted, yes, we work on behalf of our client and yes it is our job to do what is best for that said client, but can we not do it openly and honestly? The facts should never change, after all they are indeed facts – and a fact is a fact is a fact, period.
So instead of just throwing away the facts when they don’t fit whatever frame someone else deems necessary, let’s throw away the frame or manipulate it to fit the facts. I wouldn’t want my thoughts, emotions or views tainted because someone didn’t like the truth. They say truth hurts and the facts don’t lie… so are we lying when we change the facts and not the frame? Hmm... I’m starting to think so.
